Daryl Manhart

About Daryl

Daryl Manhart is an AV® Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 peer review rated attorney in Martindale-Hubbell. He is a senior shareholder handling commercial and real estate transactions, commercial litigation, and general business representation. Daryl is also the firm’s principal appellate attorney handling civil appeals, including special actions, in state and federal appellate courts in diverse practice areas, including cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. The firm’s trial lawyers regularly consult with him on significant motions and other matters to help position cases for a successful outcome on appeal. Daryl is called upon by lawyers in other firms for consultation on their appeals or for referral as appellate counsel. Daryl also served for ten years as an adjunct professor at Grand Canyon University from 1995 – 2004. He taught business law at both undergraduate and graduate levels. Reported CasesU.S. Supreme Court Decisions: Horne v. Flores, 557 U.S. 433 (2009) District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) Federal Appeals: Campbell v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., 410 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 2005) Arizona State Carpenters Pension Trust Fund v. Citibank (Arizona), 125 F.3d 715 (9th Cir. 1997) Bankruptcy Appellate Panel: In re: Gaynes, 27 B.R. 161 (1983) Arizona Appeals: Contreras Farms v. Phoenix, 452 P.3d 715 (2019) In re Evitt, 429 P.3d 1146 (2018) Flynn v. Campbell, 402 P.3d 434 (2017) Zuluaga v. Bashas', Inc., 394 P.3d 32 (2017) Mirchandani v. BMO Harris Bank, 326 P 3d 335 (2014) Lopez v. Food City, 322 P 3d 166 (2014) Lund v. Myers, 2013 WL 3583944 (2013) Mendoza v. Gallegos, 302 P.3d 651 (2013) Lund v. Myers, 286 P.3d 789 (2012) Walsh v. Walsh, 286 P.3d 1095 (2012) Lund v. Donahoe, 261 P.3d 456 (2011) Canyon del Rio Investors v. Flagstaff, 258 P.3d 154 (2011) Dooley v. O'Brien, 244 P.3d 586 (2010) In re Estate of Zilles, 200 P.3d 1024 (2008) Haab v. Maricopa County, 191 P.3d 1025 (2008) State Farm Fire & Cas. In. Co. v. Grabowski 150 P.3d 275 (2007) Doe v. Arpaio 150 P.3d 1258 (2007) Department of Economic Security v. Hayden, 115 P.3d 116 (2005) Flanders v. Maricopa County 54 P.3d 837 (2002) Steiger v. Woods 32 P.3d 19 (2001) Saucedo v. Salvation Army, 24 P.3d 1274 (2001) In re General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in Gila River System and Source, 9 P.3d 1069 (2000) In re General Adjudication of Full Rights to Use Watr n Gila River System and Source, 989 P.2d 739 (1999) Stephens v. Bashas' Inc. 924 P.2d 117 (1996) Monti v. Monti 924 P.2d 122 (1996) State v. Korzuch, 920 P.2d 312 (1996) Hrudka v. Hrudka, 919 P.2d 179 (1995) Reed v. Mitchell & Timbanard, P.C. 903 P.2d 621 (1995) Stine v. Stine, 880 P.2d 142 (1994) In re General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in Gila River System and Source 857 P.2d 1236 (1993) Church v. Rawson 842 P.2d 1355 (1992) Bledsoe v. Goodfarb 823 P.2d 1264 (1991) Mutual Insurance Co. of Arizona v. Bodnar, 793 P.2d 560 (1990) Durnin v. Karber Air Conditioning Co., 778 P.2d 1312 (1989) Lincoln v. Lincoln, 746 P.2d 13 (1987) McGuire v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 728 P.2d 290 (1986) Amex Distributing Co., Inc. v. Mascari 724 P.2d 596 (1986) Deatherage v. Deatherage, 681 P.2d 469 (1984) Bischofshausen v. Pinal-Gila Counties Air Quality Control Dist. 673 P.2d 307 (1983) Kinnear v. Finegan 672 P.2d 986 (1983) Professional Furniture Service v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 650 P.2d 508 (1982) Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Beeson, 647 P.2d 634 (1982) Ott v. Samaritan Health Service 622 P.2d 44 (1980)

Practice Areas

Languages